• 04 October, 2022
Foreign Affairs. Geopolitics. National Security.
MENU

Terrorism is Not a Game

Anil Trigunayat Sun, 14 Aug 2022   |  Reading Time: 4 minutes

As both India and Pakistan celebrate their 75th anniversary of their independence, unfortunately, Pakistan is identified as the progenitor and a safe haven for terrorism and global terrorists stalking and staring at the world with impunity due to state patronage. Pakistan itself claims to be the victim of terrorism and flashes out statistics to prove it. But it forgets that if you nurture those mercenaries, they will come to bite you back.

There is an old Indian popular legend of a demon Bhasmasur, who prayed endlessly to Lord Shiva asking for powers that on whosoever’s head he puts his hand – that person will burn to ashes. Indeed, the God gave that benediction to him. Next step was that he wanted to try on the God himself, to see if it actually worked. Moral of the story is that terrorists are no one’s friends and will come to target even the sponsors if that suited them. Moreover, Pakistan has unfortunately pawned its future to radical ideology in its quest of one upmanship against India under the garb of illegally supporting the disgruntled Kashmiris. In this game unfortunately it has found its iron clad friend China to cover its back and that of the terrorists whom the world wants to designate. In the recent case of Abdul Rauf Azhar, brother of the dreaded Masood Azhar, the Chinese play book remains the same.

1267 Committee of the UNSC tries to designate global terrorists within the prescribed parameters. It is also within the right of a member state to take some time if they wish to consider all dimensions of the matter. But China has taken an exceptional route to delay and deny the listing and sanctioning of dreaded terrorists through a hypocritical stance as a matter of routine. In such cases there is a little doubt about the concerned terrorist or terror group’s culpability and every additional day provides them sustenance and emboldens them even further.  Meanwhile Pakistan continues to use terrorism as a political tool and as an instrument of foreign policy against India and others. It has also been subjected to severe scrutiny by the FATF as well. And the terrorists thrive.

China obviously is not directly benefiting from it except by protecting its all-weather friend in Pakistan. This is the third notorious case including Masood Azhar, Abdul Rehman Makki and Abdul Raouf Azhar of Jaish e Mohammed (JeM) -a mastermind of the 1998 hijacking of Indian flight IC 814: Parliament and Pathankot attacks. All were wanted in India and also listed by the US.

India which had mooted the proposal to list Azhar was supported by 14 members of the UNSC except China that put a technical hold on it for six months. In the similar vein Beijing put a hold in June on Abdul Rehman Makki, Deputy Chief of Lashkar-e- Taiba (LeT). Second one in a year and we have few more months to go. India rightly called it ‘unfortunate’ and replete with double speak and double standards. Thank you, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.

Since Beijing has an adversarial relationship with both New Delhi and Washington at this point of time it was a way of getting back at both. It probably wanted India to stick to ‘One China Policy’ while it battles out with the adversity in Taiwan fracas and face loss due to Pelosi visit. It had an exactly opposite effect since India and China do have a history and New Delhi has learnt from it even if rather late in the day. But how expensive could that be for China itself let alone the disservice they are doing to their all-weather ally and its people.

This is not the way that terrorism, extremism and radicalization can be fought. Selective approaches of ‘My terrorist vs Yours’ (or an analogy of good terrorist vs bad terrorist) will lead to giving a free run to the terror groups who will continue to enjoy the bounty placed on their heads and will travel freely and garner funds and weapons of their choice. Geopolitics gets the better of the global good. No wonder the Indian Ambassador (PR) to UN Ruchira Kamboj and Official Spokesman Arindam Bagchi lamented, “It is most regrettable that genuine and evidence-based listing proposals pertaining to some of the most notorious terrorists in the world are being placed on hold… double standards and continuing politicisation have rendered the credibility of the Sanctions Regime at an all-time low.” But the deaf can’t hear but pretend to dance all the same.

It was in 2016 when Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke at the UNGA and while in the USA, he regretted that the world was not able to even define terrorism let alone fight against it. Global fight against terrorism has become a sham. He reiterated, “Humanist forces in the world will have to put pressure so that it is decided in black and white what is terrorism. Since there is no definition, talk about good terrorism and bad terrorism is going on. We cannot protect humanity with this good and bad terrorism- terrorism is terrorism”. India’s proposal for a Comprehensive Convention on Terrorism (CCIT) has been in the cold storage at the UN since 1996 because of selectivity by member states.

India has suffered from cross border terrorism for over four decades and has even followed a policy of “Talks and Terror” cannot continue with Pakistan after repeated terror attacks that were directly linked to Pakistan based terror groups with the connivance of the deep state there.  Hence, post Uri and Pulwama, India shifted gears adopting ‘Zero Tolerance’ and to be aggressive against terror camps and outfits both internally and across the border. India has learnt to take care of the threats posed. Balakot and several other retaliations attest to that. However, high state of vigil is a pre-requisite if we have to keep people and country safe as the likes of China and Pakistan will learn from their mistakes in due course, for terrorism will spare none. But by then it may too late.

Meanwhile, ‘Ekla Chalo Re’ is the dictum we have to follow.

**********


Author
Anil Trigunayat is a former Indian Ambassador to Jordan, Libya and Malta and is a Distinguished Fellow and head of the West Asia Experts Group at the Vivekananda International Foundation. He is a regular commentator and contributor on foreign policy issues.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect the views of Chanakya Forum. All information provided in this article including timeliness, completeness, accuracy, suitability or validity of information referenced therein, is the sole responsibility of the author. www.chanakyaforum.com does not assume any responsibility for the same.


Chanakya Forum is now on . Click here to join our channel (@ChanakyaForum) and stay updated with the latest headlines and articles.

Important

We work round the clock to bring you the finest articles and updates from around the world. There is a team that works tirelessly to ensure that you have a seamless reading experience. But all this costs money. Please support us so that we keep doing what we do best. Happy Reading

Support Us
Or
9289230333
Or

POST COMMENTS (1)

Kalidan Singh

Aug 15, 2022
It is not a game. Okay then, what is it? The fundamentalists claim is simply stated: (a) the book gives me the authority to create a world in which I have absolute power to do what I wish (i.e., determine the fate of other people), and (b) if I cannot have it, then I am going to unleash violence on the most vulnerable until you submit. This is Pakistan's and China's foreign policy. They may look at different books, but that their modus operandi are identical.

Leave a Comment