• 27 December, 2024
Foreign Affairs, Geopolitics & National Security
MENU

Jaishankar hits out at critics of India’s import of Russian crude oil

Sat, 04 Jun 2022   |  Reading Time: 2 minutes

New Delhi, Jun 3 (PTI) If Europe manages to procure oil and gas from Russia in a way to ensure that the impact on its economy is not traumatic, that freedom should exist for others as well, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said on Friday.

His comments at an interactive session during a conference in the Slovakian capital Bratislava came against the backdrop of mounting Western criticism of India’s import of discounted Russian oil.

Today, Europe is buying oil and gas from Russia and new package of sanctions is designed in a way considering the welfare of the people while timelines have been set for reducing Russian energy imports with no immediate cuts, he said.

“People need to understand that if you can be considerate of yourself, surely you can be considerate of other people,” he said.

Jaishankar was asked about reports of a nine-fold increase in India’s import of crude oil from Russia.

“If Europe manages in a way that impacts on the economy is not traumatic, that freedom or choice should exist for other people as well. India is not sending people out ‘saying go buy Russian oil’, buy the best oil in the market, no political messaging should be attached to this,” he said.

Asked about claims of India was involved in the trans-shipment of Russian oil, Jaishankar said he has not heard of anyone in India even thinking of trans-shipment of Russian oil.

“A country like India would be crazy to get oil from somebody and sell it to somebody else. This is nonsense,” he said.

To another question on whether India is not funding Russia’s war by buying oil, he wondered “if buying Russian gas is not funding the war”, an oblique reference to various European nations procuring gas from Moscow.

He also said that if countries in Europe and the West were so concerned, why were they not allowing Iranian and Venezuelan oil to come to the market. “They’ve squeezed every other source of oil we have and then say, okay guys, you must not go into the market and get the best deal for your people. I don’t think that’s a very fair approach,” Jaishankar said.

Asked about India banning the export of wheat, he suggested that it was done to prevent diversion to high-income countries and to not give those involved in speculative trade open access to the Indian market.

Jaishankar said India has been exporting wheat to several countries. “But what we then saw was a kind of run on our wheat, a large part of it done by international traders based out of Singapore and, maybe to some degree, Dubai and the result was the low-income countries, many of whom were our traditional buyers like neighbours Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal, the Gulf buys regularly Yemen Sudan, low-income buyers were being squeezed out,” he said.

Jaishankar said wheat was being stocked for being traded, and, in a way, India’s goodwill was being used for speculative trading.

“So we had to do something to stop that. Prevent diversion to high-income countries with a greater possibility to buy like with vaccines,” he said.

Jaishankar said the decision was required to not give the speculators open access to the Indian market so that Indian customers and the least developing countries get the supplies.

He said India is still open to supplying wheat to any deserving country.



Chanakya Forum is now on . Click here to join our channel (@ChanakyaForum) and stay updated with the latest headlines and articles.

POST COMMENTS (1)

Kalidan Singh

Jun 05, 2022
Good for Mr. Jaishankar. Playing defensive is fine, responding with rhetoric questions is fine. But I wish Mr. Jaishankar would start offensive. Such as: 'I suspect you are unclear that as a representative of a democratic republic, the citizens of India owe no explanation to you about our relations and trade with Russia. Any more than your government owes Indian citizens answers about why you buy gas and minerals from Russia, why you sell arms to the most unstable of forces around the world, why you support military dictatorships. Or why your politicians, businesses, and bankers are in bed with the worst elements of Russia. Any concerns about that? Or are you here to defend the double standards. Get real, ask me a real question. What India buys from whom is our business, not yours.' 'Ask me about India's foreign policy interests, I just don't respond that well to 'gotcha' questions.' 'Thanks for the question about communal, religious-affairs issues in India. Your question seems untethered to an understanding of Indian politics, or our history in which a foreign religion was largely imposed on the point of a sword. No, you have no awareness of that, do you? You are trying to stir up a controversy. Are Indians concerned about communal violence? Yes. We are concerned, we want communal harmony. Our constitution guarantees religious freedom. As does yours. Now, is there a culture clash in Western Europe despite your best intents? Did we all imagine Charlie Hebdo and other unforgivable acts of violence against European citizens? What side of Charlie Hebdo are you on? We are on the side of innocent victims. Where do you get off asking India to explain a culture clash, and communal violence in India - when despite your intents and resources, you have problems here. Or are you so naïve, that you cannot extrapolate from problems you are facing as a result of recent immigration from your former colonies, to complex issues of religion when we have had a thousand years of domination by religions not indigenous to India. Are you expecting communal harmony at a snap of a finger? If so, I am calling out your naivety. Get real and ask me a question of consequence.' 'Your questions about India's problem between Hindus and Muslims, seems too tethered to a reality that has passed us, and is now irrelevant and outdated. Your reference is to the actions of Indian intellectuals (who were mostly socialists, if not communists), and to the Indian congress party that sought unrelenting validation for its actions from Pakistan and Islamic nations. It never occurred to them that appeasement was unnoticed by others, that it triggered a wrong sense of entitlement in India, and it worsened our democratic processes. They were slowly sliding toward making Sharia - if not the law of the land, then the law for select Indian citizens. Previous governments may have pandered to select voters in order to maintain power. Things change. They have in India. Today's Indian citizen is engaged and alive. We are a democracy, where each person (despite religious affiliations) is equal. I should not have to remind you how democracy works. As such we will not tolerate undemocratic privileges for people based on religious affiliations, or affiliations to books and mores that are foreign to us, and were essentially brought in and imposed by invaders. We won't do it any more than countries in Europe are willing to change themselves to accommodate Nazis who invaded them at a time, or change your sociopolitical processes and culture to accommodate the ideas being imposed on you by your immigrants. Are you questioning the French, the Dutch, the Belgians, why they do not treat Nazis as an equivalent philosophy and grant those pursuing it as a faith, equal rights to do as they wish? Are you demanding that all European women wear the hijab, to ensure no Islamic cleric is unoffended? If not, why are you asking me whether India intends to coddle faiths and pursuits foreign to India's ancient cultures? Your questions about India's communal harmony are hypocritical and provocative; ask me that when you have achieved such harmony in your democracies. To your point, we don't condone violence. When violent crimes are committed, by anyone, we investigate them within the framework our laws. I suspect you do as well. Next question.' This is what offense sounds like. You go Jaishankar, you are the best thing that happened to India's foreign policy since Chanakya, Shivaji and other greats. Thank you for your service. We support you. Go on offense. Defense is for weak people. We are not weak people.

Leave a Comment

Featured Articles

Popular News